AZFamily 3TV Interviews attorney Josh Kolsrud following Georgia Shooting
In September 2024, a tragic high school shooting in Georgia shocked the nation, resulting in the deaths of two students and two teachers. As the legal process begins to unfold, one of the most crucial elements involves the prosecution of the 14-year-old shooter, Colt Gray, and his father, Colin Gray.
AZ Family's 3TV turned to Josh Kolsrud, a federal criminal defense attorney, for insight into the complexities surrounding this case.
The Alleged Shooter: Colt Gray
Colt Gray, only 14 years old, has been charged with four counts of alleged felony murder. Prosecutors have chosen to try him as an adult under Georgia law, a decision that brings significant legal challenges. During his court appearance, Colt did not enter a plea and remains in custody without bail.
Josh Kolsrud explains that while it is not legally difficult for prosecutors to charge a juvenile as an adult, convincing a jury to convict a minor can be far more complicated. One of the key issues in such cases is the mental capacity of the defendant. The prosecution must prove that Colt Gray had the ability to fully comprehend the consequences of his actions, which may present difficulties in court.
Kolsrud highlights that defense attorneys often build their cases around concepts like diminished capacity or mental instability. These factors could play a crucial role in Colt's defense, particularly if it can be shown that he lacked the mental capacity to understand his actions.
The Father's Role: Colin Gray
Colt’s father, Colin Gray, age 54, is also facing serious charges, including four counts of involuntary manslaughter, two counts of second-degree murder, and eight counts of cruelty to children. According to court documents, Colin Gray allegedly gave his son the firearm used in the shooting, despite knowing his son posed a threat to himself and others.
Kolsrud points out that the charges against Colin Gray, especially second-degree murder, hinge on the concept of child cruelty. For the prosecution to succeed, they must demonstrate that Colin’s decision to provide his son with a weapon caused emotional or psychological harm, contributing to Colt's actions.
In essence, the prosecution must argue that Colt had underlying mental issues that were exacerbated by his father's negligence. This forms part of the defense’s potential argument that Colt's diminished capacity or mental state played a significant role in the shooting.
Investigative Failures and Missed Warnings
One of the more troubling aspects of this case is the alleged failure of law enforcement to possibly have prevented the shooting, despite multiple red flags. Kolsrud notes that authorities had previously received several anonymous tips about online threats made by Colt, which targeted an unidentified school. Although both Colt and his father were interviewed by law enforcement at the time, no arrests were made, and the investigation did not lead to any charges.
Kolsrud expresses concern that the FBI, which had knowledge of the threats, did not take a more active role in the investigation. He suggests that the FBI’s current focus on other large-scale investigations, such as the January 6th insurrection, may have limited their resources and ability to follow up on every potential threat.
Two Cases: Father and Son
As the case moves forward, one of the questions is whether Colt or his father will be tried first. Kolsrud notes the significance of the trial order, as the outcome of one case could impact the other. If Colin Gray is found guilty of second-degree murder and child cruelty, it may bolster the defense’s argument in Colt’s trial that his father’s actions and Colt’s mental state contributed to the tragedy.
Kolsrud is also interested in how the defense will handle Colt’s mental health, noting that diminished capacity defenses are often employed in cases where the defendant may not have fully understood the consequences of their actions. The dynamics between Colt, his father, and other family members, including previous reports of domestic violence and involvement from Child Protective Services, could all influence the defense’s strategy.
Conclusion: A Tragedy with Complex Legal Implications
The Georgia high school shooting is a tragic case on multiple levels. It involves not only the senseless loss of life but also complex legal challenges that touch on issues of juvenile justice, mental capacity, and parental responsibility.
As the legal process continues, both Colt and Colin Gray face potentially life-altering consequences, and the courts will have to navigate the difficult task of assigning responsibility in a case filled with emotional and legal intricacies.
Josh Kolsrud's expert analysis sheds light on the various factors that will play a role in the trials, including the challenge of prosecuting a juvenile as an adult and the father’s potential liability for enabling his son’s access to firearms. It is clear that this case will serve as a significant test of Georgia’s legal system, with implications that could reverberate far beyond the courtroom.
Contact us today to schedule a
FREE CONSULTATION and learn
how we can help you.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney From Kolsrud Law
An award-winning criminal defense attorney Since 2006
Why Choose Josh Kolsrud
With over 100 trials to his name, and years of experience as a state and federal prosecutor, Josh understands the law, the legal process, and your rights. Josh is also committed to representing every client with utmost integrity and dedication
Experience
Josh has prosecuted major crimes on the state and federal level, led a successful anti-human sex trafficking operation that saved lives, and argued before countless juries and justices for his clients
Expertise
Josh is an expert in both Arizona and federal criminal law, and is ready to put that expertise to work for you.
Dedication
As a prosecutor, Josh saw far too many defendants lose their livelihood due to poor representation. Josh will always give every client his complete attention and effort
Get a Free Initial Consultation:
Complete our form below to get a free case review.
or call us at (480) 999-9444.