Attorney Josh Kolsrud Analyzes the Lori Vallow Daybell Guilty Verdict: Key Legal Takeaways

June 12, 2025 - News 12 Phoenix

The recent guilty verdict in the high-profile Lori Vallow Daybell case has drawn national attention, with many questioning the speed of the jury’s decision and the strategies at play during the trial. Criminal defense attorney Josh Kolsrud, founder of Kolsrud Law Offices, joined Phoenix’s News 12 team to offer his expert analysis on both the verdict itself and the unique legal journey that led there.

 

A Surprising Speed: What the Jury’s Quick Verdict Means

One of the most striking elements of the trial—highlighted immediately by Josh Kolsrud—was the jury’s speed in reaching a verdict: less than 30 minutes. While the previous Daybell trial took about three hours, both outcomes were rapid.

 

Kolsrud attributes this to the absence of a true defense strategy on the part of Lori Vallow Daybell. “She did what she was supposed to do at least halfway, which was poking holes in the government’s theory,” he noted. But ultimately, when it mattered most, Vallow failed to put forth an active defense, such as blaming another party (known as a third-party defense).

 

“She just told the judge, ‘We rest.’ So the jury really didn’t have anything to consider other than what the prosecutor told them,” Kolsrud explained. This lack of a defense left the prosecution’s narrative uncontested, streamlining the jury’s path to a conclusion.

 

The Pitfalls of Self-Representation

The interview also delved into Vallow’s decision to represent herself, a choice that, in Kolsrud’s professional opinion, put her at a severe disadvantage. “You needed an experienced defense attorney to kind of take control and get the wins where you could,” Kolsrud emphasized.

 

He detailed important aspects of trial lawyering—such as cross-examining witnesses—that can backfire without years of experience. “You don’t want a defendant cross-examining a victim, because it’s going to seem personal no matter what.” This lack of separation, combined with missed opportunities to challenge forensic evidence or redirect blame, hampered Vallow’s defense.

 

Critical Evidence Left Unchallenged

Kolsrud pointed out specific areas where an experienced attorney could have made a significant difference. For example, he mentioned that some forensic evidence was collected as much as thirty days after the crime—details an adept defense could highlight to sow doubt. There were also technical concerns, such as a license plate reader with a 10% margin of error, that went unaddressed by Vallow.

 

By not “making those points get out,” Vallow lost the chance to create reasonable doubt, ultimately leaving herself at the mercy of a comprehensive prosecution.

 

The Significance of a Third Trial

With this verdict marking the third and final major trial for Lori Vallow Daybell, many have questioned the necessity and impact of repeated prosecutions. Kolsrud offered crucial context: “The reason why Maricopa County and [the prosecution] went forward with this case was, number one, to give the victims justice…but number two, to protect the first verdict which was in Idaho and the second…as well.”

 

Importantly, Kolsrud explained that each case served as a safeguard against potential appeals or overturned convictions. “It was worth it because it’s a safety net just in case the other cases are overturned. We know that she’s going to spend the rest of her life in prison.”

 

Justice Served—A Message to Victims

Reflecting on the broader legal significance, Kolsrud concluded: “Justice is done regardless of whether the crime took place in another state or whether it’s here—Arizona will still go after you even if you already have life sentences. And that is a great message for victims.”

 

Conclusion

The Lori Vallow Daybell case stands as a testament to the importance of experienced legal representation and the determination of prosecutors to secure justice, even across multiple jurisdictions and verdicts. Attorney Josh Kolsrud’s insights remind us that the justice system’s intricacies matter—and that every defendant deserves skilled advocacy.

 

For more expert analysis from Josh Kolsrud and updates on high-profile legal cases, continue reading our blog or contact Kolsrud Law Offices for consultation and defense you can trust.

Contact us today to schedule a
FREE CONSULTATION and learn
how we can help you.

An award-winning criminal defense attorney Since 2006

Why Choose Josh Kolsrud

With over 100 jury trials to his name, and years of experience as a state and federal prosecutor, Josh understands the law, the legal process, and your rights. Josh is also committed to representing every client with utmost integrity and dedication

icon1

Experience

Josh has prosecuted major crimes on the state and federal level, led a successful anti-human sex trafficking operation that saved lives, and argued before countless juries and justices for his clients

icon2

Expertise

Josh is an expert in both Arizona and federal criminal law, and is ready to put that expertise to work for you.

icon3

Dedication

As a prosecutor, Josh saw far too many defendants lose their livelihood due to poor representation. Josh will always give every client his complete attention and effort

Get a Free Initial Consultation:

Complete our form below to get a free case review.
or call us at (480) 999-9444.