Inside the Lori Vallow Daybell Trial: Defense Attorney Josh Kolsrud Shares His Legal Insights

The Lori Vallow Daybell case has captivated national attention for years with its bizarre circumstances, tragic crimes, and courtroom drama. Last week, Fox 10 Talks hosted defense attorney Josh Kolsrud to analyze the latest twists in the high-profile conspiracy murder trial unfolding in Phoenix. Kolsrud, an experienced criminal attorney, broke down what makes this case so unprecedented—and what viewers should watch for as the legal saga continues.

Cross-Examination Drama: When a Survivor Faces an Alleged Mastermind

One of the most unique and unsettling aspects of the trial is Lori Vallow Daybell’s status as a self-represented, or “pro per,” defendant. Kolsrud emphasized just how rare it is for a defendant facing such serious charges to act as their own attorney—especially when cross-examining a shooting survivor like Brandon Boudreaux.

"In 18 years of practicing criminal law, I’ve never seen a pro per defendant get an opportunity to cross-examine a victim," Kolsrud remarked. He praised Boudreaux’s composure and clear, consistent answers, even while facing questions from the person accused of orchestrating his attempted murder. Kolsrud called Boudreaux’s testimony “pivotal,” noting his critical role as a living witness and his influence in catalyzing the investigation into the disappearance and later murder of the Vallow children, J.J. Vallow and Tylee Ryan.

Courtroom Chaos: When the Judge Stands Up

Following the emotional testimony, the courtroom’s focus shifted dramatically to Lori Vallow’s disruptive behavior. On Friday, Judge Justin Baresi reached a breaking point, removing Vallow from the courtroom after a heated exchange—something Kolsrud noted is incredibly rare.

"You could really see [Judge Baresi] had enough of her antics," Kolsrud said. Despite being generally calm and meticulous, the judge had to assert his authority when Vallow loudly objected to his direction and accused him of disrespect. Kolsrud explained that such confrontations are not only unusual, but have important legal implications for the trial’s integrity and potential for appeal.

“If she continues [her behavior],” Kolsrud explained, “[the judge] is going to revoke her pro per status and appoint an attorney, which could lead to a mistrial and delay the resolution of this case by a year or more.”

Legal Maneuvering: The Risk of "Opening the Door"

A key topic in the interview was Vallow’s apparent lack of legal strategy regarding evidence. Kolsrud pointed out that during cross-examination, Vallow tried to introduce favorable character evidence to bolster her case and shift blame to her niece. However, as he detailed: “If she opens that door, it’ll allow the prosecution to bring in evidence of the four previous homicides connecting her to every single one. Once Pandora’s box is open, you can’t unring the bell.”

This kind of misstep highlights the danger when a defendant with no legal training tries to navigate complex evidentiary rules. “Pro pers are given a little more leeway than lawyers, but if an attorney had done what Vallow tried, the judge would have immediately allowed damning character evidence in.”

A Pro Se Performance: More Harm than Help?

Kolsrud also discussed how, compared to previous cases, Vallow’s ability to effectively advocate for herself has declined. “Her inexperience is on full display,” he said, noting her inability to impeach witnesses or capitalize on inconsistent statements. “She doesn’t know how to bring things out to show the jury there are credibility issues.”

Why This Case Feels Different

Summing up, Kolsrud remarked on the many legal "firsts" this case has brought, from the cross-examination spectacle to the judge’s unprecedented removal of the defendant. Such moments, he stressed, not only set this trial apart but also serve as a real-time lesson in courtroom dynamics and criminal procedure.

"Viewers are really seeing who [Lori Vallow] is, especially in these unscripted moments in court," Kolsrud said. For all observers—legal professionals and the public alike—the Daybell case is a stark reminder of the gravity and unpredictability of the criminal justice system when confronted with an extraordinary defendant.

Stay with us for ongoing analysis of the Lori Vallow Daybell trial and more courtroom insights from top legal experts like Josh Kolsrud. What are your thoughts on the case so far? Let us know in the comments below.