Phoenix Defense Attorney Josh Kolsrud Offers Insights Into Teacher-Student Assault

Josh Kolsrud on the Limits of Self-Defense in Schools

In his Phoenix 12 News interview, defense attorney Josh Kolsrud zeroed in on the self-defense claim being floated in the case. Based on the facts shared by the school, Kolsrud said he does not see a viable self-defense argument, emphasizing that striking a child in the back doesn’t align with how self-defense is legally defined. His analysis suggests that even if a classroom situation was chaotic, the alleged response crosses a legal line—especially when force is used against a student who is not actively threatening the adult.

Why Prosecutors Are Likely Taking This Seriously

Kolsrud also explained why this case is drawing heightened scrutiny from prosecutors. He pointed out that the alleged victim being a minor is a major aggravating factor, one that increases the likelihood the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office will pursue formal charges. In cases involving children, prosecutors tend to apply a stricter lens, and Kolsrud noted that this alone can significantly influence charging decisions—regardless of whether the accused has prior experience or a clean record.

What Evidence Will Matter Most

According to Kolsrud, investigators and prosecutors will focus heavily on objective evidence, including surveillance video and witness statements from students or staff who were present. He stressed that these elements will be key in determining whether the evidence can support an aggravated assault charge in court. His takeaway: cases like this are decided less by speculation and more by what can be clearly shown and corroborated.

Key Takeaways from Josh Kolsrud:

• Striking a student in the back undermines a self-defense claim
• The involvement of a minor makes charges more likely
• Video and witness evidence will be critical to the case’s outcome

This summary highlights only the legal insights and opinions shared by Josh Kolsrud during his Phoenix 12 News interview.